Rose Ferrero School
Week Of: January 24-February 4, 2022
QUOTES OF THE WEEK WE SHARED WITH OUR STUDENTS
LCAP GOAL 5: TEACHER SUPPORT – Engaging Anxious Students
NOTE: This week’s article is a bit longer than usual, but we believe that student engagement is critical … and for some students, like those who suffer from anxiety, engagement is difficult. Even though we constantly promote the Growth Mindset and tell students every day to believe in themselves and their abilities – because we believe in them and their abilities – to those students with anxiety, those messages “fall on deaf ears” because the anxiety they feel is greater than our messages to them. Thus, this week, we wanted to discuss this topic and bring up some suggestions for our teachers.
When a student's anxiety increases, several other skills are negatively affected, including working memory (the ability to hold information and retrieve it as needed); self-regulation (the ability to adapt, emotionally and behaviorally, to the current situation); executive functioning skills (the ability to visualize future goals and complete the steps to achieve them); and accurate thinking.
There are several types of inaccurate thinking that are commonly associated with anxiety: “thinking on the downside” (assuming the worst will happen, which further escalates anxiety); all-or-nothing thinking (I am terrible at math! rather than I am just struggling with long division); and catastrophic thinking (If I fail this quiz, I'll need to repeat 8th grade). When these overwhelming thoughts flood an anxious student, executive functioning strategies alone (such as graphic organizers or rubrics) won't be enough to help them initiate an activity. Many students suffering from anxiety can get caught in a debilitating cognitive cycle: Poor executive functioning can cause a student to be anxious in school, and anxiety can cause poor executive functioning and inaccurate thinking, which in turn causes disengagement. By incorporating strategies to reduce inaccurate thinking and increase executive functioning skills, we can help students become more engaged.
By asking anxious students to start an activity or persist on a task, we may be asking them to do something they don't have the skills to execute. Students must rely on different skills required to stop, shift, or initiate a task and prescribe strategies that can help them gain the necessary skills to engage in work independently. Here's the flow:
First: Stopping the Initial Activity: The typical transition warning in classrooms is the five-minute countdown: “Five more minutes and then we need to stop reading and put our books away!” We assume that it's an adequate prompt, but we also know that, inevitably, several students will not actually stop reading in five minutes. Judging time, pacing, and making a plausible plan to be accomplished in five minutes is quite difficult, and the simple countdown prompt doesn't support the development of these skills. We can also give directions that include an action plan: “Five more minutes, which means finish the math problem you are on—don't start another one.” This level of specificity increases the likelihood of a smooth transition and improves the student's ability to make an effective five-minute plan in the future. Another strategy for ending an activity is to use the word pause instead of stop. The word stop itself is an all-or-nothing term that can elicit all-or-nothing thoughts: the student can hear “stop” as “this needs to be completed and perfect,” making it hard for them to stop when this isn't the case. However, they can typically pause without distress or misunderstanding. Finally, we can also make time visible. Visual strategies, such as drawing the beginning and end times on an analog clock with a dry erase marker, can help students visualize time goals. As opposed to a countdown timer, which can spike anxiety, seeing the available volume of time on an analog clock facilitates metacognitive thinking about how to use the time available.
Third: Initiating and Engaging in the Next Activity: Anxiety and executive functioning challenges significantly affect the ability to initiate an activity. In this third step on the path to engagement, we need to provide accommodations and teach the necessary skills to reduce inaccurate negative thinking associated with anxiety and increase the mental imaging skill of task execution. As always, we should start with supportive accommodations. When a child learns to ride a bike, we provide training wheels until they can ride independently. Similarly, we should provide accommodations to support students to initiate while explicitly teaching new skills. To encourage independent initiation, educators will need to begin by providing accommodations to compensate for the student's inability to initiate, while explicitly teaching strategies to allow them to become independent. If we remove the accommodations before the child has built the skills they need, they'll crash. Accommodations for initiation need to address both executive functioning skill deficits and inaccurate or negative thinking associated with disengagement.
Working With Inaccurate Thinking: Negative and inaccurate thoughts can derail initiation altogether, causing an anxious student to be unable to engage in schoolwork for reasons that are invisible to others. When we suspect that negative thinking is at work, it should be measured—not assumed—through data gained from interviewing the student about their thoughts and perceptions of the task difficulty, and their ability to be successful with the task. Students can even express this information independently through personal thought journals.
Two accommodations, in particular, can help anxious students change the thoughts that are preventing them from initiating a task. The first is “Rating the Difficulty.” First, have your student use a scale of 1–5 to rate the difficulty of a writing assignment, for example, (5 being very difficult) before and after the activity. In the “before” column, the student might rate it “5-very difficult” due to his anxiety-fueled perception. When you ask again, hours after the assignment is completed, the student is more likely to have an accurate perception and rate the assignment as “2-not too difficult.” It's important to use the rating sheet for five or more assignments so even if one day the student's pre-assignment rating is an accurate assessment, the overall pattern of inaccurate thinking will be revealed. Showing the student the rating sheet that includes several ratings (5–7 ideally) can help him realize his initial assessment is often off base and can guide him to more accurate thinking about future assignments.
The second accommodation to support the initiation step for anxious students is to “ask students to continue, not start.” Teachers often hand out blank paper, explain an assignment, and ask students to begin, only to notice a few minutes later that a student hasn't started the assignment … again. During those six minutes, their anxiety is rising, all-or-nothing thoughts are surfacing, and the required skills are decreasing. Consider reordering this process: Help them start long before they are anxious. Pull the student aside in the morning, preview the assignment, and have them write the first sentence or do the first math problem and then start the next one, stopping mid-sentence or 2/3 of the way through the math problem. You are leaving a dangler on purpose! Then, when the assignment is handed out to the class, you hand the student the previously started paper—essentially asking the student to continue, not start. Instead of the student having an all-or-nothing thought (I have to write three pages!), the thought, I only have to finish the sentence is much more approachable, and students will often then be able to engage without their inaccurate thinking taking over.
These strategies can give students a more realistic, less overwhelming view of tasks, and most important, teach them to think accurately about future assignments.Shifting to Independent Engagement: The best way to get students to use these stopping, shifting, and initiation skills and strategies independently is to build their ability to self-monitor—to assess what they need and choose a strategy that will help, without relying on the teacher. Once again, a visual is a great way to move the student along the continuum. For example, one might utilize a self-monitoring strategy sheet that can help students independently initiate a task. If you build your own self-monitoring outline for students, incorporate executive functioning strategies and try to avoid omitting strategies that seem obvious—some students need to be taught tools that others use easily (such as chunking or positive thinking). This self-monitoring sheet could be kept on a student's desk or as a classroom wall chart, allowing the teacher to point to the visual prompt and say, “I see you are having trouble initiating. What strategy would you like to use?” Stating that the problem is only initiation supports accurate thinking because it emphasizes that a student is having trouble with one small aspect of the assignment, not the whole subject. Eventually, the student will be able to use the chart, and strategy, without prompting. Finally, because we get more of what we reinforce, we must reward students' strategy use or skill practice, rather than just work production. "Catching" students using engagement strategies, such as giving them points on an activity when they use a strategy from the chart, promotes independence and application of task engagement skills, allowing teachers to increase learning time for every student in their diverse classrooms.
A Matter of Skill Building: The path to student engagement requires an understanding of the impact of executive functioning deficits and anxiety on students' abilities—and a focus on providing accommodations and skill building. When we give students the supports and skills they need, they can engage in school independently while gaining confidence and self-knowledge.