Dear RBMC Member Dues Payers

Why has the furor over the 2018 election died down ...

Why has the furor over the 2018 election died down. Remember members were disqualified because of the actions of the board of directors and especially was facilitated by the then President Wanda Clark. Why was it necessary to have a past board member to be a consultant – the members of the election committee must not have nor the board been competent enough to ferret out what the legal action should be. But never mind the opinion was given to let the recently removed chair to be a candidate then but that board chose to ignore the legal advice, we paid for to be ignored. Remember their were at least 4 others not allowed to be candidates in 2018. Will hazard all was done for political reasons to keep the member's candidates off the ballot.

This year's election was restarted not because of real violations ...

This year's election was restarted not because of real violations but by again interpretations as presented by Wanda Clark to 2 directors and they agreed... Now good money is being spent to have the accounting firm provide the necessary integrity and interpretations so we may have a fair and honest election but the unfairness has already happened as recommended by Wanda Clark. (Why can't the directors secure the bath houses? Gives the members something to carp about which does change the members focus from the election.)

Those of you who still have access to the official Facebook site are now being bombarded with this covenant and that covenant to no end. ...

Those of you who still have access to the official Facebook site are now being bombarded with this covenant and that covenant to no end. This is on purpose so that the members will loose what little focus they had about this year's and last year's election. The GM played her part in this year's election by contacting an attorney for legal advice. Why didn't our directors do it. Seems a director is doing her job and is the GM doing the directors job? Has anyone seen the legal opinion in writing, a memo for record or is it just their good god fearing word to go by? (Did you notice? This year they are going by the lawyers advice.)

Even though this year's election process has restarted the goal to disqualify members as viable candidates has already happened. ...

Even though this year's election process has restarted the goal to disqualify members as viable candidates has already happened. This was and is being done by their absolute control of all the information and who has access to it. Also, they do have the right to do as they wish in very large measure and declare it is being done in the memberships best interest. Don't believe that. All is being done to perpetuate the current members of this board of directors with the aid of the current election committee. The chair is a past president.

A Riverbender