E-portfolio Design

Chaewon Jeon MYP technology design report

Design introduction

I have created 4 designs for my e-portfolio.I outlined the positive and negative from the other people points of view and also my perspective . I will compare this with the opinion form other people and my opinion.


Design 1

The product i create must:
  • Be free <yes>
  • must be asssesable in a variety of electronics (laptops, smartphones, ipad etc) <yes>
  • Be able to store work produced in all classes (art work, video, music) <yes>
  • Contain section/pages for all myp subjects. (MIA C&S) <It has all subjects but doesnt have the MIA and C&S>
  • Have a homepage with good name /URL, your name and somethings about yourself, photo of you, links to these pages ( All classes, C&S and MIA) <yes>


Big image

Design 2

-positive


  • clear
  • organized
  • easy to know each section

-negative

  • too musch space

Big image

Design 3

-positive


  • neat
  • interesting

-negative

  • hard to make


Big image

Design 4

-Positive


  • lots f section
  • putting nisc logo
  • just like it -Sp-

-negative

  • hard to make
  • small logo
  • name at side

Big image

Design specification

The product you create must:


  1. be free
  2. electronic and accessible from any device that can be connected to the internet (tablet, smart phone, desktop computer and laptop)
  3. be able to store work produced in all classes, i.e. a wide variety of files (images, text, video and sound)
  4. contain sections for all MYP subjects, MIA and C&S
  5. have a home page that explains both who the student is and an introduction and explanation of the e-portfolio, furthermore, there must be a photo of the student
  6. have a good URL &/or Title
  7. be professional and academic... not cute, funny, silly, etc.
  8. clear and good info
  9. nice format
  10. something is easy to make


The best design

I think the best design from my designs is Design 1.
Because its simple to make it have a balanced layout to make.


Assessment for Criterion B: Design

0 The student does not reach a standard described by any of the descriptors below.


1 — 2 The student generates one design, and makes some attempt to justify this against the design specification.


3 — 4 The student generates a few designs, justifying the choice of one design and fully evaluating this against the design specification.


5 — 6 The student generates a range of feasible designs, each evaluated against the design specification. The student justifies the chosen design and evaluates it fully and critically against the design specification.