Sammie Roberge
These children go before sibling
Introduction Each list is associated with a timeout. The waiting time seems to be more important than the number of people in the queues. In turn, the standby time is determined by a complex series of related factors, both queuing system patients and the supply of services. Therefore, management management system queue of waiting lists two parameters, the average delay, and the average wait is used. The average delay is defined as the time from the patient is introduced on the waiting list until it receives the service.
The average wait, introduced in the territory Invalid in the year, is defined as the time they have been on the waiting list patients who have already come out of it in a given period (waiting lists). Thus, there has also been defined or considered that a patient is on the waiting list when it exceeds the time set by the health management system queue authorities without receiving treatment. For example, in the UK it was established that a patient could wait months to undergo surgery. In Spain, the National Health Institute set an objective of intervention before the months since. In Valencia was queuing system established in the year as patients in waiting list for surgery, those with more than three months timeout (Decree/ of May).
The existence of waiting lists, initially respond to a prompt need to facilitate planning and encourage the use of resources, however, lose its when they are exaggerated and do not discriminate between the marginal benefit of a patient and the considerable benefit of others. That is when socially perceived as a negative aspect of the health system. WAITING LISTS. There is little, but strong evidence for the growth in demand for health services. Changes in the population structure, the pressures in the primary level of care, patients' expectations and the growing ability to treat patients are often cited as possible reasons for the apparent increase in the demand.
Waiting lists are conditioned by two indisputable truths are on the one hand, the limitation of resources, which are fixed by the Budget Law approved by the representatives of society in parliament and the another by the growth in demand. In turn, demand depends on both cultural and educational factors as technological. The progress of society and technological advancement make health queuing system is valued more and better. In addition, there seems to be that the maximum health that supply is always ahead of demand and Introduction this is met, an increase in resources is followed by an increase in demand authors think that the growth in demand is the generator waiting lists health factor is nothing but a common fallacy by managers of public health. Waiting queuing system lists are not inevitable, reflecting both the lack of health resources as inadequate management of them by managers and heads of services.
Queue Theory Topics Day 1
A third factor has been implicated consider health workers as favoring the waiting lists voluntarily and artificial right to press either the government or by queuing system private interests to encourage private health. However, there are also some who believe that the absence of a waiting list, would not only be economically costly if not, sanitary little. So that any attempt to eliminate waiting lists, particularly surgical, require an intensive increase in system resources to provide adequate assistance in peak periods, which would determine treatment capacity queuing system that would be remaining ordinary.