Human Cloning
Should the cloning of humans be legal?
Cloning
In 1997 british scientists began to clone Dolly there were 277 eggs only 29 of those made it to be emryos and yet only one was born. Twenty-Eight embryos were destroyed and 276 eggs to make a single clone. After Dolly mice, pigs, goats, and rabbits were next. When Dolly was succesfully cloned several countrys were afraid humans would be cloned next so they ban the research of human cloning.
Dolly
First cloned cat
Endangered Species
Pros
- Clone extinct organisms
- A pig with human properties
- Docters could clone human skin
- Clone Quality meat
- Clones would not be copys
U.S. Ban
Cons
- Dolly died hidden problems
- more than 80% fail
- Clones could be "property" or not have rights
- Cloning of cells has failed to make cures
- While researching embryos are destroyed
- If there was a field of wheat tons would die
Should the cloning of humans be legal?
Bibliography
Works Cited
Brock, Dan W. "Research Cloning Is Ethical." Cloning. Ed. Jacqueline Langwith. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2012. Opposing Viewpoints. Rpt. from "Creating Embryos for Use in Stem Cell Research." Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics38.2 (Summer 2010): 229-237. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 4 Dec. 2014.
"“CC” The First Cloned Cat." UPI Photo Collection. 2010. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 10 Dec. 2014.
"Cloning." Opposing Viewpoints Online Collection. Detroit: Gale, 2014. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 4 Dec. 2014.
Cook, Michael. "Human Embryonic Stem Cell Cloning Has Failed to Yield Effective Cures." Human Genetics. Ed. Louise I. Gerdes. Farmington Hills, MI: Greenhaven Press, 2014. Opposing Viewpoints. Rpt. from "Not with a Bang but a Whimper."MercatorNet. 2013. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 10 Dec. 2014.
"Dolly, the first cloned mammal." Animal Rights. Kim Masters Evans. 2009 ed. Detroit: Gale, 2010. Information Plus Reference Series. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 10 Dec. 2014.
"First Ever Cloned Endangered Species Makes Public Debut." UPI Photo Collection. 2009. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 11 Dec. 2014.
Foley, Elizabeth Price. "The United States Should Not Ban Human Cloning." Cloning. Ed. Jacqueline Langwith. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2012. Opposing Viewpoints. Rpt. from "The Constitutional Implications of Human Cloning." Arizona Law Review43.2 (11 June 2011): 16-46. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 4 Dec. 2014.
Kass, Leon R. "The United States Should Ban Reproductive Cloning and Place a Moratorium on Research Cloning." Cloning. Ed. Jacqueline Langwith. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2012. Opposing Viewpoints. Rpt. from "Defending Life and Dignity: How, Finally, to Ban Human Cloning." The Weekly Standard 13.23 (25 Feb. 2008). Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 4 Dec. 2014.
Saunders, William, David Prentice, and Michael Fragoso. "Research Cloning Is Not Ethical." Cloning. Ed. Jacqueline Langwith. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2012. Opposing Viewpoints. Rpt. from "False Promises: Common Cloning Claims Refuted." Family Research Council Brochure. Family Research Council, 2008.Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 4 Dec. 2014