By Liz Remington

For GMOs

I am in favor of GMOs, because in the foods that have GMOs in them we eat almost every day. What's the point of scientists discrediting the food they eat themselves. Is it to help their company get more money? One example is that their is just not enough evidence that GMOs are harmful. In this flyer the order is simple alphabetical in support and the other side.

Big image
GMO Corn

My support

1. Over the last years, various GMO crops with health benefits have been developed in which genes, are mostly originating from other organisms.(Science Daily)

2. GMOs can get rid of potently harmful ingredients in food.(Pollack, Andrew)

3. They put in only desired traits and remove all the bad ones, and can also transfer genes across species. (Reville, William)

4. GMOs and non-GMOs are nutritionally equivalent. (Steven Novella)

5. Society, the economy, and the environment have benefitted enormously from GMO crops. (Marc von Montagu)

6. There is very little science that states that GMOs are unsafe, and agribusinesses fear mandatory labels will spook customers. (Wozniacka, Gosia)

Big image
This is a picture of a scientist working with GMOs.

The Other Side

1. Some may think there is little known about GMOs. (Wozniacka, Gosia)

2. The DNA of GMOs can have hundreds of thousands of mutations. (Institute for Responsible Technology)

3. The activity of up to five percent of their natural genes can be significantly changed. (Institute for Responsible Technology).

Big image


1. GMO stands for genetically modified organisms. (FDA)

2. GMOs must follow safety requirements. (FDA)

3. There is just as much risk of eating a GM food as there is to eating a natural food. (FDA)

4. GMOs must be tested before they are allowed (The Non-GMO Project)

Big image


Works Cited

Ghent University. "GMOs with health benefits have a large market potential." ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 13

January 2015. <www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/01/150113090428.htm>.

The Non-GMO project. 2015 Non-GMO Project, 2015. Web. 11 Feb. 2015. <http://www.nongmoproject.org/learn-more/what-is-gmo/>.

Pollack, Andrew. "New Potato, Hot Potato." New York Times. 08 Nov. 2014: B.1. SIRS Issues Researcher.

Web. 03 Feb. 2015.

Pollack, A. (2014, Nov 08). New potato, hot potato. New York Times Retrieved from <http://sks.sirs.com>

Reville, William. "Let's Open Our Minds and Mouths to GM Food." Irish Times. 17 Oct. 2013: p. 12. SIRS Issues

Researcher. Web. 03 Feb. 2015.

Reville, W. (2013, Oct 17). Let's open our minds and mouths to GM food. Irish Times Retrieved from


Steven Novella, MD, is an assistant professor of neurology at Yale University School of Medicine. He is the host of the Skeptics’ Guide to the Universe podcast, author of the NeuroLogica blog, executive editor of the Science-Based Medicine blog, and president of The New England Skeptical Society.

U.S. Food and Drug Administration, ed. FDA Facts: Food from Genetically Engineered Plants. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. N.p., 7 Apr. 2013. Web. 8 Feb. 2015. <http://lgdata.s3-website-us-east-1.amazonaws.com/docs/3025/1320008/GE_Plant_QA_Final.pdf>

Van Montagu, Marc. "The Irrational Fear of GM Food." Wall Street Journal. 23 Oct. 2013: A.15. SIRS Issues

Researcher. Web. 03 Feb. 2015.

Van Montagu, M. (2013, Oct 23). The irrational fear of GM food. Wall Street Journal Retrieved from


William E. Crist,Toxic L-tryptophan: Shedding Light on a Mysterious Epidemic; and Jeffrey M. Smith, Seeds of Deception, Yes! Books, Fairfield, IA 2003, chapter 4, Deadly Epidemic

Wozniacka, G. (2014, Nov 06). Despite losses, GMO label backers aren't quitting. Statesman Journal Retrieved

from http://sks.sirs.com

Wozniacka, Gosia. "Despite Losses, GMO Label Backers Aren't Quitting."

Statesman Journal. 06 Nov. 2014:

n.p. SIRS Issues Researcher. Web. 03 Feb. 2015.