Social Security Disability Attorney

.

Significance of Grand Rapids Social Security Disability Attorney

At an initial or recon determination before the DDS, personal appearances are rare. The overwhelming majority of advocacy takes place on paper, and, occasionally, by telephone. Once the case is appealed to a federal administrative law judges the fundamental tenor of the proceedings changes. It is within this transformed venue that the representative is most needed and, is likely most effective. No longer is the determination based only on paper records. Instead, a full evidentiary presentation is possible. At the hearing Grand Rapids social security disability attorney might appear in person, submit the new evidence, and examine the evidence used in making the decision or determination under review and present and question witnesses.

Because the decision by the judge is not solely limited to a paper review, the claimant’s credibility when testifying becomes a key factor affecting the final decision. In this, the administrative appeals hearing are no different from an appearance in a court of law. However, there are fundamental differences between the administrative proceeding and one in the courts. Understanding the essential differences between the two proceedings is a necessary first step in attaining competency in the administrative appeal, as defined in the newly adopted regulation. One difference is simply the fact that the government, having previously denied the claim administratively (by the action of the DDS), does not appear at the hearing. The only present party is the claimant. At an actual hearing, only the judge, the claimant, the Grand Rapids social security disability attorney, and other witnesses are present. The government does not appear as a party. The administrative hearing before the administrative law judge is thus a single-party proceeding, and as such, becomes an entirely different kind of hearing from that of the traditional two-party contest.