Law Enforcement Surveillance

Does it violate our rights?

The First Ammendment

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
Police finding surveillance cameras, media helping to solve crimes quicker

Crimes are Solved

Police surveillance has helped solve a plethora of crimes. It has been criminal justice's greatest technological advancement. This system has created a safer world.

The Opposition

Those who are opposed to police surveillance believe it infringes upon the first amendment. The argument is that the "freedom of speech, or of the press" is violated.
However, police surveillance is only used against you if you commit a crime. Speaking your mind about the government will not get you arrested.

The Final Verdict

Law enforcement surveillance has been a great help to society. It has shown its efficiency in solving crimes, and it has seen the faces of countless criminals. The only valid reason to oppose such a righteous act, is if you yourself have done something to draw "the eyes of the ranger".