Take 2: Why Do We Need It?
By Michael Vang
It's Not Always Right to Scrap Take 1
Sure, it would be fun to have a clone, but why would you need a clone of yourself or an animal? Cloning a human or an animal has little to no benefit right now as it is merely just experimentation with more questions then answers. There is no guarantee that genetically cloning will yield success on the first try, and even it will not be known if the clone will be healthy. If not this, then the clone could have deformities and or psychological and developmental issues.
Twins
While not clones, twins Lisa and Jessica Origliasso provide a good example of how genetic cloning is not always exact.
The First Clone
The first cloned animal, Dolly the sheep, was not cloned through what most people see as cloning. She was born with the cells of one mother, DNA of a second, and carried to term by a third.
Three Parent Humans
Alana Saarinen is one such case of three parent children, as she was born through cytoplasmic transfer, and has the DNA of three different parents. After her birth, cytoplasmic transfer was banned by the FDA due to fear of safety and ethics.
I am here to present a message about my stance on cloning.
Disregard the information on the bottom as I had to fill it in and couldn't remove it from the top part.
Email: example@email.com
Website: chs.centralunified.org
Location: 2045 North Dickenson Avenue, Fresno, CA, United States
Phone: (559) 276-0280
Facebook: facebook.com/example
Twitter: @example